Highlights of Union Budget (2021-22) – M&A and Startup

Paytm, the fintech decacorn, announced that it is preparing to airlift 21,000 oxygen concentrators (OCs) to India as part of the #OxygenForIndia project, which is scheduled to arrive in the first week of May. Government hospitals, Covid treatment centers, private hospitals, nursing homes, and Resident Welfare Associations will all receive these machines right away. People have already contributed INR 5 crore to the project, which the corporation has matched rupee for a rupee, bringing the total to INR 10 crore. Paytm is now targeting to collect over INR 14 Cr to source over 3,000 OCs over the next few days, buoyed by the immense support and contribution from people across the country.

In collaboration with logistics startup Delhivery, Zomato Feeding India has launched the “Help Save My India ” project to procure oxygen and related supplies for hospitals and families in need. Unacademy, the edtech unicorn, has donated INR 7 crore to Zomato ‘ s Feeding India project to purchase medical supplies.

Dream11, the fantasy gaming unicorn, has donated INR 15 Cr to GiveIndia and ACT Grants (a million each) to aid in emergency Covid response efforts in India. “Half of this will be spent on addressing the current issue of supplying medical equipment and hospital beds, while the other half will be used to support large-scale vaccination drives.

CRED, headquartered in Bengaluru, has also initiated a fundraising campaign to help healthcare organizations purchase oxygen concentrators. Milaap has invited its members to donate their CRED coins toward the purchase of oxygen-related equipment, which will be facilitated by the startup. The initiative ‘ s goal is to raise funds to purchase equipment capable of producing one billion litres of oxygen.

Fintech unicorn Zerodha has announced plans to include ambulances and a step-down hospital to tackle the deadly second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. In the cities of Mumbai and Bengaluru, fully equipped ambulances will be available. Each ambulance is fitted with a ventilator, critical care equipment, medicine, a nurse, and a paramedic, according to Zerodha. Half of them will have a doctor on board, while the other half will use remote doctors, according to the study. Five ambulances are also fitted with freezing capabilities.

FundTQ, Asia’s largest institutional investor connect platform has partnered with Klub, a leading Indian revenue-based lending platform. This partnership will provide startups across India access to fast, founder-friendly, and flexible funding.
Klub provides SMEs with scalable capital and has completed 450+ investment rounds for its SME partners as they grow. The company’s investment platform combines financial product innovation, deep data-driven analytics, high-frequency collections, and community engagement.
Through this partnership, startups in FundTQ’s portfolio will be able to avail of Revenue Based Financing through the Klub platform.
Aanchal Mahani, Founder, FundTQ, said “We are delighted to partner with Klub as this will deepen the range of capital offerings to startups on our platform. Integrated deeply with Klub, this partnership will allow us to move in the right direction to help scale early-stage companies further.”
FundTQ is Asia’s first valuation SaaS and one of its kind investor-connect platform. The software allows founders to run a transaction themselves.
The FundTQ valuation software values a business idea in 10 minutes and gives an automated comprehensive report called “Impacteaser” which can be instantly shared with investors.
The Choose Right Investors Platform is designed for mid-to-late-stage entrepreneurs looking for funding and M&A opportunities from relevant institutional and strategic investors based on their ratings and relevance.
FundTQ also provides access to a marketplace for entrepreneurs to access ready-to-use pitch decks, financial models, valuation models, legal agreements, extensive research reports, and other pertinent documents for fundraising and M&A.
A merger and an acquisition both involve the consolidation of business entities, resulting in a restructuring of their corporate framework to enhance efficiency and competitiveness. Despite their shared goal of achieving synergies, there are distinct differences between mergers vs acquisitions in terms of initiation, process, and outcomes.
A merger occurs when separate organizations decide to combine forces, forming a new business entity. This decision is typically mutual, with the merged entity adopting a new name, ownership, and management structure that incorporates employees from both merging companies. Mergers often aim to expand market share, enter new markets, reduce operating costs, increase revenues, and broaden profit margins. In this process, there is no exchange of cash, and the merged company issues new shares distributed proportionately among existing shareholders.
For instance, the British multinational enterprise GlaxoSmithKline emerged from the merger of pharmaceutical companies Glaxo Welcome and SmithKline Beecham in 2000.
An acquisition involves one organization acquiring another, requiring the purchase of at least 51% of the target company’s stock for absolute control. Acquisitions typically involve a financially stronger entity taking over a smaller, comparatively weaker one. Unlike mergers, acquisitions may not be mutually agreed upon, and in some cases, they can occur as hostile takeovers. The acquired company usually continues operations under the name of the acquiring company, which may retain or lay off the acquired company’s staff. There is no issuance of new shares in acquisitions.
For example, in 2017, Amazon acquired the American supermarket chain Whole Foods Inc. for $13.7 billion, with Whole Foods still operating under its original name but controlled by Amazon.
While both mergers and acquisitions (M&A) involve the combining of companies, the processes and outcomes differ significantly. Here’s a breakdown of the key distinctions:
| Merger | Acquisition | |
| Formation of a New Entity | Two or more companies come together to form a completely new legal entity. This new entity inherits the assets and liabilities of the merging companies. | One company (acquirer) takes complete ownership and control of another (target company). The target company essentially ceases to exist as a separate legal entity. |
| Decision-Making Process | Mergers typically involve a mutual agreement between both companies. Negotiations and approvals from boards of directors and shareholders are crucial. | Acquisitions can be friendly or hostile. While friendly acquisitions involve consent from the target company, hostile takeovers occur without their approval. Hostile takeovers often involve complex legal battles. |
| Company Identity | The merged entity adopts a completely new name, signifying the creation of a new organization. | The acquired company typically ceases to operate under its original name. It’s often absorbed into the acquirer’s brand identity. |
| Size and Financial Strength | Merging companies are often of similar size and financial stature. Mergers can be a strategic way for companies to combine resources, expertise, and market share. | The acquiring company is usually larger and financially stronger than the target company. Acquisitions are often used to gain access to the target’s technology, market reach, or talent pool. |
| Power Dynamics | Mergers often involve a “dilution of power” as both companies share control and decision-making within the newly formed entity. | Acquisitions result in a clear shift of power. The acquiring company holds absolute control over the target company’s operations, management, and future direction. |
Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are powerful tools for companies seeking growth and strategic advantage. Understanding the key differences between mergers and acquisitions – formation of a new entity, decision-making process, company identity, size and financial strength, and power dynamics – allows businesses to make informed decisions about the best path forward.
Mergers provide a collaborative approach for companies of similar size to combine resources, expertise, and market share. This option fosters innovation and can create a stronger, more competitive entity.
Acquisitions offer a faster route to expansion, allowing a larger company to acquire the technology, talent, or market reach of a smaller one. However, integrating different corporate cultures can be challenging.
Ultimately, the choice between a merger vs acquisition depends on the specific goals and circumstances of each company involved. By carefully considering the various factors and potential outcomes, businesses can leverage M&A strategies to achieve long-term success.
Get merger and acquisition services for your business
In today’s dynamic business world, companies constantly seek innovative strategies to gain a competitive edge and fuel growth. Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) have become a prominent strategy in recent years. While complex and risky, successful M&A can unlock a wealth of advantages for involved companies. This blog dives into the advantages of mergers and acquisitions, exploring how these strategic moves can propel organizational success.
Discover the top ten advantages of mergers and acquisitions that can significantly impact businesses:
The ultimate objective of many mergers and acquisitions is to unlock economic gains and capitalize on economies of scale. This synergy occurs when the combined strength, productivity, and efficiency of the two merging firms surpass their individual capacities. This consolidation brings about benefits such as increased access to capital, heightened bargaining power in the market, reduced costs resulting from large-scale production, and more.
Mergers and acquisitions also confer the advantage of economies of scope, which involves reducing the production cost of one product through the production of another related product. Essentially, one product complements another, leading to an overall cost reduction. Economies of scope are often achievable through mergers and acquisitions in ways that may be impractical through organic growth alone.
The financial fortitude gained through mergers and acquisitions provides both companies involved with a competitive advantage. This increased economic power translates into a higher market share, greater influence over customers, and a diminished competitive threat. Larger companies, as a rule, pose tougher competition in most industries.
Talent acquisition is a paramount concern for companies aspiring to excel in the market. Recognizing that skilled employees are drawn to well-established brands, larger companies, as a result of mergers and acquisitions, enjoy superior access to the best available talent. This phenomenon is observable across diverse industries, spanning manufacturing, technology, and services.
Through mergers and acquisitions, businesses operating in the same sector can enhance access to essential materials, suppliers, and tangible resources. For instance, a business might strategically acquire or merge with one of its suppliers, thereby optimizing production cycles and ensuring reliable access to critical materials.
Mergers and acquisitions offer companies the opportunity to diversify risk by spreading it across different revenue streams, encompassing varied products, services, and business prospects. Through this diversification, if one revenue stream faces challenges, the business can rely on other income sources to sustain its operations. Effectively managing risk diversification ensures long-term sustainability for the company.
Mergers and acquisitions provide a cost-effective alternative to starting from scratch. Establishing production centers, procuring machinery, constructing storage facilities, and initiating distribution channels incur substantial costs. Merging with a company already equipped with the necessary facilities proves more economical. Additionally, such transactions bring other merger and acquisition benefits, contributing to overall business success.
Also learn about the Stages Of M&A Transaction
Venturing into a new market poses challenges, even for established businesses. While creating a subsidiary or branch is an option, mergers or acquisitions offer a more time, cost, and effort-efficient solution compared to building from the ground up. This is especially true for companies aiming to enter foreign markets, where the complexities of international penetration make merging with or acquiring an established local business a more feasible and practical option.
Large organizations often seek acquisition opportunities where the purchase price is less than the fair market value of the target’s net assets. This financial positioning suggests that the target company may be facing financial challenges. In such instances, a merger or acquisition can help the acquired company stay afloat, while the acquiring company gains advantages such as proprietary rights to products, increased market growth, entry into new geographic regions, and more.
Some small businesses, particularly family or privately-owned, face the risk of business failure when the founder retires, lacking a clear succession plan. This situation can lead to job losses and impact business suppliers. Mergers or acquisitions provide a strategic avenue to ensure business continuity, mitigate operational interruptions, and offer job security to employees.
Undoubtedly, the benefits of mergers and acquisitions service are evident. However, for businesses to sustain the positive outcomes of such pursuits, the implementation of a tailored mergers and acquisitions strategy is crucial, aligned with the company’s unique circumstances and goals. Successful post-merger integration is equally essential, forming the bedrock for capturing synergies, fostering profitable growth, and optimizing deal valuation.
While the potential advantages are compelling, navigating the intricacies of mergers and acquisitions can be intricate. Connect with FundTQ to delve deeper into mergers and acquisitions, exploring tailored options for your business.
The M&A landscape has undergone significant transformations in the last five years, with technology playing a pivotal role. A report from PwC highlights the importance of faster integrations for achieving strategic, financial, and operational goals. M&A business advisors who leverage technology can expedite due diligence and empower informed decision-making, leading to a higher deal success rate.
As technology revolutionizes the landscape of managing intricate transactions, a divide emerges between transaction advisors who adapt swiftly and those who lag behind. Traditional advisors grapple with the challenge of keeping pace, relying on established relationships and experience to stay competitive. However, this reliance is insufficient in the face of the accelerating changes brought about by automation.
With the integration of automation, the diligence process sees a remarkable 50% reduction in time. This transformation enables junior bankers to allocate less time to mundane tasks. Such tasks include creating pitchbooks, monitoring non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), preparing confidential information memorandums (CIMs), and responding to diligence requests. Automation empowers bankers to redirect their efforts toward value-added activities.
For traditional advisors, burdened by clunky management processes and reliance on outdated Excel sheets, progress becomes akin to moving with cement shoes. Their exerted energy proves futile as the modern M&A transaction advisor, embracing technology, not only safeguards deals but also propels forward at a rapid pace.
The contemporary M&A business advisors distinguishes themselves through a centralized process and transparent practices that enhance the client experience. By merging established relationships with robust automation, they excel in making critical decisions. In contrast, outdated advisors hinder their own progress by adhering to data room information that falls short. While they cling to basic analytics, the modern advisor surges ahead.
Modern M&A transaction advisors leverage predictive analytics to anticipate buyer concerns and prepare for meetings, proactively addressing potential issues. They craft engaging diligence experiences for buyers, swiftly identifying risks. Traditional advisors, on the other hand, risk losing deals as they wait for buyers to uncover risks themselves.
As the traditional advisor painstakingly approaches the finish line, the modern advisor has already facilitated a seamless transition. Their buyer utilizes diligence data for post-closing activities and integration. The modern advisor’s approach enables buyers to plan for integration from the outset, reusing diligence data for cost and time savings. Ensuring post-closing success with a seamless handoff becomes a hallmark of their process.
While the traditional transaction advisor may complete the race, their depleted energy leaves them unable to consider the company’s success post-close. In contrast, the modern advisor positions their buyer for sustained success.

Raising funds for a startup is a common challenge, as even the most innovative ideas often require financial support to thrive. For entrepreneurs seeking ways to secure funding, various channels can be explored. Here’s a list of options to consider:
1. Crowdfunding:
Leverage the internet’s power by utilizing crowdfunding platforms. Craft a compelling fundraiser description to attract support from a global audience. Additionally, seeking contributions from friends and family can be a reliable source of funding due to their familiarity with your dedication.
2. Angel Investors:
Secure capital from angel investors who invest in startups in exchange for equity or convertible debt. Many successful tech companies, such as Google and Yahoo, have benefitted from angel investors.
3. Bootstrapping:
Maintain ownership and independence by using personal resources, such as savings or assets, through a method known as bootstrapping.
4. Venture Capitalists:
Seek funding from venture capitalists who provide capital to high-growth potential startups. Unlike angel investors, venture capitalists typically offer financing with higher return rates, often without taking ownership stakes.
5. Microloans:
Explore microloan options with fewer constraints, shorter payment periods, and, in some cases, lower interest rates compared to traditional loans.
6. Small Business Administration (SBA):
Investigate government programs, such as SBA grants or lending, as potential sources of funds. Be aware that SBA grants are competitive, and SBA lending may involve slightly higher interest rates.
7. Purchase Order Financing:
Utilize purchase order financing for businesses with consistent large product orders but insufficient cash flow. This involves a financing company paying the supplier to produce the product until payment is received from the customer.
8. Contests:
Participate in business contests offering prize money with minimal conditions. These contests often target creative businesses and social enterprises.
9. Product Pre-Sales:
Emulate successful tech companies by offering customers the option to pre-order products, generating funds to fulfill orders and gauging product demand.
10. Strategic Partners:
Collaborate with strategic partners, including suppliers, distributors, and customers, to obtain credit and supplement your budget until the business achieves financial stability. While not direct funding, this support can be instrumental.
Embarking on the intricate process of business valuation requires a nuanced understanding of diverse approaches and considerations. As the final steps unfold, the application of valuation methods and thoughtful adjustments becomes paramount. From assessing assets through the lens of the asset approach to projecting future benefits with the income approach and comparing with market trends via the market approach, each step contributes to unraveling the intricate tapestry of a company’s worth. Join us as we delve into the art and science of business valuation, decoding its complexities and shedding light on the crucial factors that shape a business’s ultimate value.
Business valuation is a critical process that provides a comprehensive understanding of a company’s worth. The final steps in this intricate journey involve the application of various approaches and the consideration of discounts that ultimately shape the conclusive value of a business interest. However, the proverbial “garbage in, garbage out” cautionary adage is vital in this context, emphasizing the significance of reliable financial information for an accurate valuation.
Three Pillars of Business Valuation: Asset, Income, and Market Approaches

The asset-based approach, also known as the cost or replacement cost approach, calculates a company’s value by subtracting liabilities from the current value of all assets. Two common methods under this approach include the Adjusted Net Asset Method and the Capitalization of Excess Earnings Method. The former establishes a “floor value” by adjusting assets to fair market values, while the latter is a hybrid method blending asset and income approaches.
The income approach is often the primary method for operating companies. Key methods include the Capitalization of Cash Flow (CCF) Method and the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Method. The CCF method is a single-period model converting a company’s benefit stream into value, while the DCF method is a multiple-period model based on projecting future benefits and discounting them to present value.
The market approach allows for comparison with similar companies. Methods within this approach include the Guideline Transaction Method, Guideline Public Company Method, and Prior Transactions Method. These methods rely on transaction multiples derived from comparable sales, either private or public, to determine a company’s value.
Check out our business valuation software
The nature of the ownership interest being valued plays a crucial role in the final steps of business valuation. Understanding control and marketability is essential:
– Controlling ownership (greater than 50%)
– 50%/50% ownership
– Minority interest (less than 50%)
Discounts for lack of control may be applied to non-controlling interests, ensuring a fair reflection of the power to influence company decisions.
– Publicly traded (high liquidity)
– Privately held (low liquidity)
Discounts for lack of marketability may be necessary for privately held companies due to the complexities, costs, and time associated with selling ownership interests.
In summary, a successful business valuation involves understanding the purpose, standard of value, level of value, and the specific ownership interest in question. Collaboration with a valuation professional is crucial to selecting the most appropriate approaches and methodologies. Careful consideration of the company’s history, industry, economic outlook, and normalizing adjustments is key. Finally, recognizing the impact of ownership interest characteristics, such as control and marketability, ensures a nuanced and accurate business valuation.
Embark on the journey of business valuation armed with knowledge and a strategic approach to unlock the true worth of your enterprise.
Also Read: Purpose of Business Valuation
An angel investor plays a crucial role in the world of startups, providing the initial financial support that can transform innovative ideas into thriving businesses. Essentially, these individuals, often with significant personal wealth, invest in early-stage ventures in exchange for equity ownership. Unlike traditional lenders, angel investors are motivated not by loan repayments but by the prospect of substantial returns if the business flourishes. In this financial landscape, entrepreneurs seek out angel investors for the favorable terms they offer, such as more flexible arrangements and a focus on equity stakes rather than loan structures. This article delves into the dynamics of angel investing, exploring who these investors are, the risks they take, and the impact they have on fostering innovation and economic growth.
Angel investors, typically affluent individuals with a keen interest in innovative ventures, actively seek out startups with promising ideas to invest their personal funds. The nature of these investments is inherently risky, with a relatively modest average investment of around $42,000 per venture. Importantly, angels prefer to limit their involvement in startups to a fraction of their overall investment portfolios, usually not exceeding 10%. These investors often emerge from various backgrounds, including former entrepreneurs themselves, and can be found within personal networks, online crowdfunding platforms, or capital-pooling networks.
While not a strict requirement, many angel investors obtain accredited investor status, a designation regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This status grants individuals access to private capital markets based on their financial acumen and assets. The SEC defines an accredited investor as someone with a net worth of at least $1 million or an annual income of $200,000 for the past two years, or a combined income of $300,000 for a couple.
Angel investors typically utilize their personal funds, distinguishing them from venture capitalists who pool money from various investors. The funding entity may take the form of a limited liability company (LLC), a business, a trust, or an investment fund established by the investor for tax or legal purposes.
Angel investors face the risk of losing their entire investment if a startup fails during its early stages. To mitigate this, they seek opportunities with a defined exit strategy, such as acquisition or participation in an initial public offering (IPO). Despite the risks, successful angel investors can achieve an effective internal rate of return of approximately 22%, making it an attractive option for those with innovative ideas and limited initial capital.
Angel investors don’t limit themselves to specific industries; they explore a wide range of ideas beyond the tech-centric reputation associated with Silicon Valley. Recent examples include supporting the establishment of archery facilities, investing in a quick-dissolving tablet developed by an anesthesiologist, and backing a business focused on carriers for electronic instruments.
In countries like India, angel investors for startups play a crucial role in propelling the entrepreneurial ecosystem forward. These financial backers not only provide capital but also contribute valuable expertise and guidance to nascent businesses. Similarly, small businesses seeking angel investors can find a lifeline in these individuals who are willing to take risks on innovative ideas. The realm of business investors for startups extends beyond borders, encompassing a global network of individuals with a shared passion for fostering innovation. Entrepreneurs worldwide actively seek out angel investors for startup businesses, recognizing the unique advantages they bring to the table.
Also Read: Angel Investor vs Venture Capital
Angel investors typically consist of affluent professionals or seasoned entrepreneurs who offer financial backing, often directed towards startups due to their potential for high returns. Many startups rely on angel investment, with 41 percent of technology sector startups in the US crediting angel investors for assistance, with an average deal size of $350,000.Angel investors are not exclusive to Silicon Valley; they invest in businesses aligned with their understanding of products or market sectors, emphasizing the significance of a strong business team alongside a compelling proposition. Lets explore the advantages and disadvantages of angel investors
Following are the advantages of Angel Investors:
Angel funding offers a swift approval process, unencumbered by the bureaucracy and institutional constraints faced by other funding sources. With fewer layers of decision-makers, angel investors can quickly navigate through approval and due diligence stages, providing entrepreneurs with timely access to crucial capital for their ventures.
Access to experience is a key advantage of angel funding. Investors willing to fund a business often bring valuable industry knowledge and insights. This hands-on experience allows entrepreneurs to benefit from mentorship, strategic guidance, and practical advice, enhancing the overall success and growth of their ventures.
Personal involvement is a distinctive advantage of angel funding. Unlike some other investors, angel investors are personally vested in the success of the business as they contribute their own money. This level of engagement motivates them to actively support and advise entrepreneurs, fostering a collaborative and mutually beneficial relationship for long-term business success.
Angel funding provides entrepreneurs with direct and immediate access to cash. Unlike some funding models that involve staggered disbursements, angel investors often inject a lump sum of capital into the business. This quick infusion of funds is advantageous for entrepreneurs seeking rapid growth or addressing urgent financial needs within their ventures.
Independence is a significant advantage of angel funding. Angel investors typically seek straightforward arrangements, exchanging capital for equity without requiring excessive control over the business. Unlike venture capital investors, angels are often more ‘hands-off,’ allowing entrepreneurs greater autonomy in decision-making and operational control, providing a balance between financial support and business independence.
Are you a startup looking to raise funds but unsure of your business value?
FFundTQ’s business valuation software gives you accurate valuations in minutes, helping you confidently raise funds. Plus, get a Pitch Deck Template – Pitchbook for fundraising to present your startup in the best light!
Following are the disadvantages of Angel Investors
One notable disadvantage of angel funding is the potential loss of equity for entrepreneurs. In exchange for the financial support provided by angel investors, entrepreneurs may be required to relinquish a portion of ownership in their business. This loss of equity can impact decision-making authority and future profit-sharing, emphasizing the importance of careful negotiation and consideration during the funding process.
Another drawback of angel funding is the risk of losing some control over the business. While angel investors may not exert as much influence as venture capitalists, entrepreneurs may still experience a reduction in decision-making authority. In extreme cases, the investor could even remove the entrepreneur from a leadership role, highlighting the need for clear terms and agreements in the funding arrangement.
Angel funding comes with the disadvantage of heightened pressure to perform. Since angel investors invest their own money with the expectation of returns, entrepreneurs can expect increased scrutiny and a demand for positive business outcomes. This pressure can be a motivating force, but it also necessitates thorough planning and a commitment to meeting the investor’s expectations for business growth and success.
Selecting an angel investor aligned with your business is crucial:
1. Thoroughly check references.
2. Ensure they aren’t investing in direct competitors.
3. Assess compatibility and potential working relationships.
4. Investigate the success or failure of their previous investments.
5. Evaluate their level of business involvement and commitment.
Important considerations during negotiations:
1. Perfect your presentation, articulating your business plan clearly.
2. Specify the required funding amount and its purpose.
3. Be transparent, as angel investors appreciate honesty about potential challenges.
4. Be prepared for thorough scrutiny during due diligence.
5. Negotiate terms carefully, balancing business vision with necessary compromises.
6. Seek professional advice for structuring funding contracts.
7. Conduct a final ‘sanity check’ with legal and financial experts before committing.
In conclusion, the advantages and disadvantages of angel investors must be carefully considered by entrepreneurs. While angel investors offer essential funding, mentorship, and networking opportunities, they may also require significant equity and influence over business decisions. It’s crucial for startups to evaluate these factors to ensure that partnering with an angel investor aligns with their long-term goals and vision.
Also Read: Angel Investors vs Venture Capital